WAR BY IQ: Recent Comments

Comment on IQ of Italian Americans: Implications for Nuclear Weapons

business directory — Wed, 09 May 2012 02:12:49 GMT

Yet another excellent post. I'm happy I came across this. I'll tweet your blog post so my friends can read this too!

Comment on To all my posters and readers

rrpeppe40 — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 01:47:29 GMT

Thanks. I appreciate your interest. Eventually I hope to have a Facebook group. All of us who think that Nuclear Weapons must be controlled can participate.
To continue the refrain of my blog - nuclear weapons reflect engineering talent. Now that virtually all of the Chinese boys are in school, it is obvious that they have some very talented engineers to work on nuclear technology. They will never accept vulnerability to American nuclear weapons without making Americans similarly vulnerable. The fact that America has an economy about three times larger than the Chinese economy will not prove to be enough of an advantage. Economic wealth has been the great determining factor for weapons systems prior to nuclear weapon, but what we have seen in the past 50 years is that engineering talent can trump great wealth. Russia and China have a considerable economic disadvantage compared with the U.S. but over the past 50 years Russia and China have managed to build weapons systems that can destroy America in less than an hour.
The key differences between nuclear systems and those weapons systems that have preceded the nuclear age are 1.Nuclear systems; intercontinental ballistic missiles, extremely sophisticated guidance systems and hydrogen bombs make whole civilizations vulnerable. There will be no winners after an extensive nuclear exchange. 2. America for all its advantages in economics, does not have enough of an IQ advantage to produce a weapons system that the best Russian and Chinese engineers cannot match. Thanks again

Comment on WSJ- 04/20/07, The Chinese Peasantry

Shawnda Houston — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:28:20 GMT

This is a wonderful article. Gracias for the information.

Comment on Pat Buchanan, the Neo-Cons and the Real Lesson of Vietnam

UnmagoNemafaf — Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:39:00 GMT

Rather quite good topic

Comment on WSJ- 04/20/07, The Chinese Peasantry

Swordconjuror — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:35:08 GMT

Very simple in words but in reality, many discrepancies, not so peachy!

Comment on MIssile Defense will follow the 50 year trajectory of Missile Offense

Ananrad — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:40:08 GMT

That's it for this article begin to read this blog. Plus, a subscriber:)

Comment on "Bush Has Made Us Vulnerable" Well, Yes and No

Silverhammer — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:41:48 GMT

Very amusing thought, well told, just do everything laid out on the shelves:)

Comment on North Korea, Iran and the Bell Curve

Badora — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:39:53 GMT

I, too, is sometimes see, but somehow had not attached any importance to this.

Comment on "Bush Has Made Us Vulnerable" Well, Yes and No

Moralbine — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:58:28 GMT

Cool:) You could say it exploded my brain! :)

Comment on N. Korea: The Axis and physics class

sexy — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:26:31 GMT

Your site isinteresting, putting the site to your bookmarks.